Sunday, December 29, 2019

Bib 104 Old Testament Bible Dictionary Project - 940 Words

BIBL 104 February 15, 2015 Old Testament Bible Dictionary Project Genesis The book of Genesis is one of the better-known books of the Bible. Not only is it the first book of the Bible it is also the first documentation of our existence. The book was originally written in Hebrew with the title of bereshit, which means â€Å"in the beginning.† (Bible.org) While the author of Genesis is never actually named, it is believed that Moses wrote the book of Genesis. In Acts 7:22 Luke recaps that Moses was trained in the â€Å"wisdom of the Egyptians† and was the only one who was prepared to integrate and understand the manuscripts and oral narratives in the Pentateuch. Only Moses was qualified enough to be given the task of writing Israel’s†¦show more content†¦The sea is known for its violent storms because of the difference in temperatures. Hills and mountains that reach nearly 2,000 feet high on the east side bound the sea. Another contributing factor to the storms is that the Sea of Galilee is only about 200 feet at its deepest, w hich causes the wind to create violent waves. The Sea of Galilee is where Jesus performed many of His miracles. Four of apostles-Peter, Andrew, James, and John came to Jesus after he stilled a ragging storm; this is also, where Jesus and Peter walked on water. The Sea of Galilee also is the backdrop for feeding 5,000 people with only a loaf of bread and two fish. This is also, where Mary of Magdala was from. The Sea of Galilee is present throughout the Bible it is referenced in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Number, Deuteronomy, Joshua, and 1 Kings. Works Cited The Sea of Galilee in the Bible. (n.d.). Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/bible_places/the_sea_of_galilee.htm The Sea Of Galilee. (n.d.). Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.keyway.ca/htm2002/seagal.htm Sea of Galilee. (n.d.). Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.bibleplaces.com/seagalilee.htm Zavada, J. (n.d.). Bible Facts About Noah and the Ark. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://christianity.about.com/od/biblefactsandlists/fl/Noah-and-the-Ark.htm Deem, R. (n.d.). Who Was Noah? Retrieved February 15, 2015,

Saturday, December 21, 2019

Diabetes Mellitus ( Dm ) Comprises A Group Of Metabolic...

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) comprises a group of metabolic disorders that share the common phenotype of hyperglycemia. Diabetes is a very debilitating disease, affecting approximately 8.3% of the adult population or 382 million across the world. The area most afflicted by diabetes is the Western Pacific, which includes China- affecting about 138 million. In the United States it is approximated that 29.1 million (9.3% of the population) have diabetes. If the trend continues to rise as it does, it is estimated that 592 million people worldwide will have diabetes by 2035. Not only does diabetes wreak havoc on a person’s state of health, it also has serious impacts on our economy, especially in developing countries. It is estimated that the costs to treat and prevent diabetes were about $548 billion in 2011. In the USA, $245 billion was spent towards diabetes in 2012 and with the consistent rise in diagnosis, that number may be $500 billion by 2025. Diabetes can be categorized into a few categories, the well-known sectors being type 1 and type 2. Type 1 DM is characterized by complete insulin deficiency as opposed to type 2 DM (90%–95% of new cases of diabetes) which is characterized by variable degrees of insulin resistance, impaired insulin secretion, and excessive hepatic glucose production. There also exist other, more rare classifications of DM, which include: DM caused by genetic defects (ie. maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)), diseases of the pancreas (chronic

Friday, December 13, 2019

Senior Year †Memory Book Free Essays

The final year of high school has now come. When my parent’s told me that high school would fly by, they weren’t kidding. I never put much thought into the fact that high school is a mere four years of my life. We will write a custom essay sample on Senior Year – Memory Book or any similar topic only for you Order Now In the grand scheme of things, it’s hardly any time at all. Although It really did fly by, I have enough memories to last a lifetime. I remember walking through the doors on my very first day of school as a freshman. I walked into room 315 and sat down in my first period class. It was world history and Mrs.. Francis was my teacher. I sat down, scared out of my mind, and waited for the bell to ring. That first bell tone signified the beginning of my high school career. My schedule was extremely easy first semester. I had Foods, Business Management, Consumer De, Lunch, Gym, Warrior Warehouse, English and Algebra 2. I had some incredible teachers, which included Mrs.. Tradeoff, Mr.. Gross, Mrs.. Burr, Mrs.. Chart and Mr.. Mere. I have had so much fun and I loved having each of them. When second semester rolled around, It wasn’t so easy. I only had four real classes, but a few of them were tough. My schedule went along the lines of Foods, Government, College Com H, Lunch, CICS, Warrior Warehouse, Gym, and Algebra 2. This year I was lucky enough to have Mrs.. Tradeoff, Mr.. Burr, Mrs.. Myers, Mr.. Hosking’s and Mr.. Myrrh. They have been one amazing group of teachers. I learned so much from each and every one of them and I could not thank them enough. The beginning of my senior year, I was asked to be in the warrior warehouse Instead of having a study hall. Mr.. V called me down to his office and I remember being so scared because I never even knew where his office was. He then asked me to be In there and I said yes. I was thrilled because I have always thought I was a great leader and knew that I had a full Job to take on. It was my responsibility to make ere I did not let anyone steal and when a problem occurred I let Mr.. V know Immediately. It was such an honor that he asked me to be In there and let alone ask me again for the rest of the year. High school has been an emotional roller coaster for me. Eve stayed up until two a. M. Working on assignments, crying over boys, and deciding what to wear for picture day. I have met and lost friends throughout my four-year Journey, and I have changed more than I ever thought I would. However, the most important part of high school has been learning who I am. As clichà ©Ã‚ © as it may sound, high school is the place where I found myself. Eve flourished with my strengths and struggled with my weaknesses. Though it was difficult at times, and I wanted to give up often, It was all worth It. High school has been full of crazy events, From the SST. Baldric’s day rallies to the four and a half hour ACT, it has been one memorable journey. T Off It seems like only yesterday I was reading Romeo and Juliet in Mr.. Rebecca English class. Now, I am Just months away from graduating and starting my life. My grandpa once told me that I would spend four years trying to get out of high school, and the rest of my life trying to get back in. He was exactly right. I thought high school would be a drag and I would never get out. Being Just months away from graduating, I wish I could start all over. Although it has been an incredibly dramatic and emotional Journey for me, I don’t regret a single moment of my high school career. I have had the chance to meet some amazing students and teachers. I have coasted through classes, and I have been pushed to my limit. I learned that learning has no boundaries and the things I learn in school will definitely come into play later in life. I Just wish I had taken a second to stop and look around. High school really did fly by. How to cite Senior Year – Memory Book, Papers

Thursday, December 5, 2019

Defines the morality of an action Essay Example For Students

Defines the morality of an action Essay Walzer argues that He was acting as a moral man ought to act; his is not an example of fighting heroically, above and beyond the call of duty, but simply of fighting well. It is what we expect of soldiers. 12 But is this the case? What risks do we have a right to ask soldiers to take upon themselves in order to protect civilians? We can begin to answer this question by looking at two similar examples: bombers operating in occupied France during World War II and in the recent NATO action in Kosovo. In occupied France members of the French resistance operated an air force which bombed German military targets in the country. However, this necessarily entailed a degree of risk for any civilians in the area. At this time, bombs were nowhere near as accurate as they are today. The members of the Free French Air Force, as they were known, chose to fly and bomb from a lower altitude than they would have usually have done in order to reduce the risk to civilians. However, this increased the risk to themselves by making themselves more vulnerable to anti-aircraft fire. 13 In Kosovo, on the other hand, NATO bombers operated at 15000 feet in order to avoid anti-aircraft fire from the ground. However, this meant that not only was the accuracy of its bombing reduced, but pilots were unable to obtain visual confirmation that there were no civilians present in target areas. 14 Arguably, this policy directly resulted in the deaths of a number of civilians. One now infamous incident involved the deaths of 70 Kosovan Albanian refugees who were killed on April 14th 1999 when bombers mistakenly targeted a convoy of refugees outside the village of Djakovica, believing it to be a military convoy. 15 Should the air crew have risked their own lives in order to ensure more accurate targeting? General Michael Short, Commander of Allied Air Forces, Southern Europe, related a conversation with air crew after the incident at Djakovica: They came back to me and said we need to let the forward air controllers go down to 5000 feet. We need to let the strikers go down as low as 8000 feet and in a diving delivery to verify their target, and then right back up again to 15000 feet. We think that will get it done. We acknowledge that this increases the risk significantly, but none of us want to hit a tractor full of refugees again. We cant stand that16 As a result of this conversation and incidents in which civilians were killed, NATO altered its rules of engagement so that pilots flew from 8000 feet rather than the original 15000. This would appear to me to indicate that the aircrew themselves accepted that they should shoulder increased risk rather than transfer that risk to civilians. This seems to me to be a link between the two cases the soldiers themselves are prepared to accept more risk then is required by international law, and subsequently what is asked by their respective militaries. Cook argues that force protection (in other words keeping soldiers alive and operative) will often outweigh other considerations such as civilian safety when military commanders decide upon rules of engagement for a particular incident or war. 17 However, in the two cases above at least, individual soldiers appear willing to take more moral responsibility than what is legally required of them. A relevant issue here, and a major difference between the two cases, is that of whether soldiers have the same obligations towards foreign civilians as they do towards their own civilians. .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e , .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .postImageUrl , .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e , .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e:hover , .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e:visited , .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e:active { border:0!important; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e:active , .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u475bb60b6fd3d1949cd4b7792a86431e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: None Provided Essay SummaryWhen soldiers sign up they sign a covenant between themselves and their nation. They agree to protect and serve their nation in exchange for being sustained and rewarded by commensurate terms and conditions of service. 18 Is it therefore any more problematic to ask soldiers to put themselves at greater risk to protect foreign civilians, not in direct protection or defence of their home nation? Cook argues that soldiers sign up to protect their own country rather than other peoples and that in cases such as humanitarian intervention force protection is a higher priority than normal. 19 Legal guidelines for the protection of civilians do not make any such distinction between national and non-nationals. However, as discussed above, legal and moral obligations do not always coincide. I would argue against Cooks view that a soldier involved in humanitarian intervention in another country is not directly serving the interests of his home state. I would argue that the prevention of severe human rights abuses such as genocide or other war crimes is of benefit to all nations, not just the one being protected at that particular time. Thus, I would say that in todays globalised world, the conception of the national interest is far more broadly defined than it ever has been. That is not to say that states only intervene in cases of human rights abuses when their own interests are at stake. This may be the case, but it is irrelevant to my current question. However, I would argue that the interests of all countries are served by having an international order in which human rights abuses are not tolerated. Thus, there is no conflict between the military covenant and asking soldiers to risk their lives in cases of humanitarian intervention. Moreover, we are all supposed to be morally equivalent as human beings. Derrida argues that we should have no more moral obligations towards our own family then we do towards strangers. He states that we have a general and universal responsibility towards all people equally. We cannot justify giving morally preferential treatment to those who are more familiar to us, as every other (one) is every (bit) other. 20 By this, Derrida means that even members of our own family are others to us, just as much as complete strangers. If this is the case, how can we justify having different moral standards for protecting civilians of your own or different nationalities? There is a danger that Derridas argument could be seen as being nihilistic if we cannot prioritise helping any one person or group of people then we must help no-one. However, even if we do not accept the basis of Derridas argument, I would assert that his conclusion is correct. All people are morally equivalent, not necessarily because they are all equally other to us but because a moral theory should not differentiate between people based on arbitrary characteristics such as their race or nationality. A relevant moral question in all of this is that of what is the more important when it comes to judging the morality of an action the action itself or the motive behind it. St Augustine claimed that the heart is the sacred seat of virtue as long as ones motives and intentions are pure, one is a moral person. 21 So in other words it is the intention that defines the morality of an action, not the action itself. Therefore it could be argued that the killing of civilians is not always immoral if the soldiers do not aim for their death. But is it enough for soldiers simply not to aim for the deaths of civilians; or do they have an obligation to minimise the deaths that they believe they may cause? Anscombe argues that if we are answerable for the unintended consequences of our action as well as the intended consequences then morality itself breaks down. .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb , .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .postImageUrl , .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb , .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb:hover , .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb:visited , .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb:active { border:0!important; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb:active , .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uacbc4e42ea61f98c9452d2adc0277efb:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Resilience : Resilience For Health Care Consumers And Health Professionals Essay22 However, what about the unintended but foreseen consequences of our actions? Obviously these are two related but different things. Unforeseen consequences are those which cannot be anticipated before an act. Unintended consequences however are those consequences which are not intentional, but which may have been foreseeable. As stated above, Walzer argues that with respect to protection of civilians in a situation in which they may be endangered it is not enough for soldiers merely not to intend to kill or injure civilians. Additionally, they must also make allowances for the foreseeable con sequences of their actions.